Monday, May 24, 2010

GPS Overhaul To Better See You

http://autos.aol.com/article/satellite-speed-cameras/?ncid=AOLCOMMautosharmain0001&sms_ss=email

Satellite Speed Cameras

In many cities it's almost impossible to walk around without your movements being recorded by surveillance cameras. In fact, driving anywhere in Britain means having a picture of your car and license plate being snapped multiple times per journey. But what if you were being tracked from space, by satellite? It sounds spooky, but it’s now a reality in some parts of the world. A trial program of a new speed camera system in Britain dubbed “SpeedSpike” has led some media to proclaim it an even deeper descent into a "Big Brother" society while decrying the technology as an invasion of privacy.

The Slippery Slope

The technology, explains Andy Howard, head of road safety at U.K. motoring group AA, is not quite as sinister as it might sound. "It's just a normal speed camera," he says, but one that is hooked up to a network of speed cameras that use GPS satellites to track their locations, rather than directly tracking a driver's route. Every time a car is photographed by one of the speed cameras, the time is recorded, and then the system calculates the average speed between two cameras to determine whether the driver was speeding.

"Theoretically, you could guard every entrance to a town and see if anyone averaged 30 mph inside," Howard said. "But we don't think this is likely."


It would be "mathematically difficult" to calculate if a motorist has broken speeding laws if they'd traveled through multiple speed zones, according to Howard, like driving from a 45 mph limit to a 70 mph zone on a highway. The technology would be most applicable on a long-distance run along a single highway, say, from London to Edinburgh.



"We already have 'average-speed' cameras through roadworks (construction zones). Cameras snap your license plate as you go in and as you go out," he said. These cameras have been in service recording driver information since 2000. The only difference is that while these cameras are connected by wire, the new cameras would use GPS.

“A Bit Iffy”

Though the prospect of cameras that track speeds by calculating distance over time has long been discussed in British motoring circles, the new GPS satellite angle has caused quite a stir.

The responses we garnered from U.K. motorists when they were informed of the new satellite tracking experiment were uniformly negative. This instinctive recoil strengthened when I mentioned that a unit of an American company, Tennessee-based PIPS Technology, is the one implementing SpeedSpike. PIPS did not respond to requests for comment. Similarly, the British government said it does not comment on trials that are still underway.



Dylan Sharpe, the campaign director of U.K.-based Big Brother Watch, told AOL: "We're very much opposed to more surveillance. The government now knows exactly where we've been and how much we drive.



"We've had GPS systems, sat-nav systems, it was only a matter of time before an agency worked out how to [use] GPS [to] track cars and their speed.”


But Howard says any data collected by the system and the transmission of driver information is regulated by the government, so "if you have the right guidelines and rules then the system wouldn't be inappropriate.

"

Support for regular speed cameras across the U.K. runs between 69 and 74 percent, according to AA's figures. So while there are undoubtedly concerns over the spread of this sort of speed camera tracking, it seems as if the general public -- and the media -- are perhaps being just a little myopic on the issue.

GPS is getting an $8-billion upgrade

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-gps-20100523,0,3054578.story

Improvements, including the replacement of satellites, aim to make the system more reliable, more widespread and much more accurate.

Without it, ATMs would stop spitting out cash, Wall Street could blunder billions of dollars in stock trades and clueless drivers would get lost.

It's GPS, and it's everywhere.

Although most people may associate the Global Positioning System with the navigation devices that are becoming standard equipment on new cars, GPS has become a nerve center for the 21st century rivaling the Internet — enabling cargo companies to track shipments, guiding firefighters to hot spots and even helping people find lost dogs.

"It's a ubiquitous utility that everybody takes for granted now," said Bradford W. Parkinson.

He should know. Three decades ago, as a baby-faced Air Force colonel just out of the Vietnam War, Parkinson led the Pentagon team that developed GPS at a military base in El Segundo.

Now, scientists and engineers — including those at a sprawling satellite-making factory in El Segundo — are developing an $8-billion GPS upgrade that will make the system more reliable, more widespread and much more accurate.

The new system is designed to pinpoint someone's location within an arm's length, compared with a margin of error of 20 feet or more today. With that kind of precision, a GPS-enabled mobile phone could guide you right to the front steps of Starbucks, rather than somewhere on the block.

"This new system has the potential to deliver capabilities we haven't seen yet," said Marco Caceres, senior space analyst for aerospace research firm Teal Group. "Because GPS touches so many industries, it's hard to imagine what industry wouldn't be affected."

The 24 satellites that make up the GPS constellation — many of them built at the former Rockwell plant in Seal Beach — will be replaced one by one. The first replacement was scheduled to be launched from Cape Canaveral this weekend. The overhaul will take a decade and is being overseen by engineers at Los Angeles Air Force Base in El Segundo, where Parkinson and his team developed the current system.

"We know that the world relies on GPS," said Col. David B. Goldstein, the chief engineer for the upgrade.

San Diego found out firsthand in 2007, when the Navy accidentally jammed GPS signals in the area, knocking out cellphone service and a hospital's emergency hospital paging system for doctors. New York experienced a similar problem a year later.

The upgrade is designed in part to prevent such outages by increasing the number of signals beamed to Earth from satellites that orbit 12,000 miles above. By triangulating the signals from four satellites, GPS receivers — and there are now more than a billion of them — can pinpoint your location on the ground.

Although "positioning" is an obvious application of the technology, it's also become a crucial timekeeper for the financial industry. Transactions made everywhere, from ATMs to Wall Street stock trades, are time-stamped using precise atomic clocks ticking within the GPS satellites. The clocks are accurate to one-billionth of a second. It's a crucial technology for Wall Street, where a fraction of a second could mean billions of dollars.

Before GPS, explorers and seafarers figured out where they were by looking at the sun and the stars. Even with the advent of gyroscopes and radios, navigation was still imprecise, with an average margin of error of a mile or two.

The Cold War sparked the necessity for something better.

When the Soviet Union launched the world's first orbiting satellite, Sputnik, in 1957, scientists at Johns Hopkins University scrambled to track it. They soon realized they could determine Sputnik's position by monitoring the radio waves it emitted.

That led to a breakthrough concept. If radio waves could be used to track a satellite from Earth, the radio waves from the satellite could also be used to determine the position of an object on the ground.

The Pentagon jumped at the idea. The Navy in particular needed help guiding its submarines that carried nuclear missiles. Because the submarines spent months underwater and only surfaced sporadically, they did not have a precise way of knowing where they were, which diminished the accuracy of the missiles.

In the 1960s, the Pentagon launched more than a dozen satellites under a program called Transit to help the submarines, which were outfitted with an antenna that could receive satellite signals when they surfaced.

But the system was accurate only to within 100 feet — and only when a submarine wasn't moving. The government needed something better.

That's where Parkinson came in. In 1972, the Pentagon tapped him to develop a satellite-based navigation system that had more naysayers than supporters. Parkinson recalled frequent trips to Washington to deflect criticism from politicians and even some Pentagon brass that decried the project as a waste of taxpayers' money.

"I was told that the system was useless and that it had no future," said Parkinson, 75, who is now professor emeritus at Stanford University. "I guess we proved them wrong."

In addition to Rockwell, Parkinson enlisted engineers at Aerospace Corp., also in El Segundo. The first satellite was launched in 1978 and the system began partially operating with 21 satellites in 1993.

The military seized on the technology quickly, using GPS to guide troops through sand storms during the first Gulf War. A few years later, in 1995, GPS became a household name after Air Force Capt. Scott F. O'Grady used his hand-held unit to guide rescuers to his position after his jet was shot down over Bosnia-Herzegovina.

» Don't miss a thing. Get breaking news alerts delivered to your inbox.

Since then, GPS has revolutionized warfare. GPS is used to direct the drones seeking out insurgents in Afghanistan, and has made "smart bombs" so accurate that they can be dropped from 40,000 feet and still land within 10 feet of their target.

The Pentagon operates and controls the GPS satellite system used in every country around the world. Until 2000 it deliberately degraded the signals that could be read by civilian devices. Commercial applications soared in 2000, when President Bill Clinton ordered the Pentagon to stop making the signals fuzzy.

Worried that the U.S. could flip the switch and shut off GPS to the rest of the world, several countries are developing their own satellites to wean themselves from relying on technology controlled by the U.S. military. The European Union, China and Russia are spending billions of dollars to develop their own versions.

Commercial applications, meanwhile, continue to multiply.

NavCom Technology Inc. in Torrance makes a remote-control system for tractors that steers by GPS. The company refines GPS signals with other ground-based navigation devices so that farmers can watch their tractors plant seeds in straight rows without overlapping in their fields.

Oil riggers pay a monthly subscription for a GPS service that enables them to zero in on oil fields that lay thousands of feet below the surface on the ocean floor.

The number of users who subscribe to such services is expected to balloon to at least 15 million this year, up from 100,000 six years ago, according to Frost & Sullivan, a San Antonio research firm.

"That's not including the hundreds of millions of people who get the signals for free on applications through their cellphones," said Daniel Longfield, industry analyst with Frost & Sullivan.

Under the $8-billion upgrade, Boeing Co.'s Space and Intelligence Systems in El Segundo is building 12 satellites the size of sport-utility vehicles, and 18 others will be assembled by Lockheed Martin Corp. in Denver. Twenty-four will go into orbit and six will be reserved as spares.

The first phase is more than three years behind schedule, costing taxpayers about $1 billion. Much of the delay has been blamed on Air Force demands for new features, including the ability to upgrade the satellites' software while they are in space.

The new satellites will also triple the amount of signals available for commercial use and will have atomic clocks that are even more precise — keeping time to a fraction of a billionth of a second.

"GPS has truly become the lighthouse of the world," Parkinson said. "It's just remarkable how the system has evolved over the past 30 years. It'll be just as interesting to see what will come in the next 30."

No comments:

Post a Comment