Saturday, May 2, 2009

Don't Fear The Reaper

Swine Flu Hysteria Spreads Faster Than Actual Virus
Why are governments acting as if armageddon is around the corner when swine flu has claimed just one victim all week?
Paul Joseph Watson \ Prison \ Friday, May 1, 2009
Despite the fact that swine flu has claimed just one victim all week, a kill rate multiple times lower than the common flu, governments of the world are acting as if armageddon is right around the corner.

David Rothscum Reports: Autism, Eugenics and the split within Humanity New
Homeland Security Issues Alert On Mandatory Quarantine Procedures
BATF and FBI to forcibly detain Americans despite only 7 confirmed swine flu deaths in Mexico and none in U.S.
Paul Joseph WatsonPrison Wednesday, April 29, 2009
The Department of Homeland Security has sent out an alert to health care providers outlining how BATF, FBI, and U.S. Marshals will be called upon to impose mandatory quarantines in the event of a widespread swine flu outbreak in the U.S., despite the fact that the virus has only caused seven confirmed deaths in Mexico and none whatsoever in the U.S.

Immunisation Advisory Centre: Gardasil Deaths "Mainly Motor Vehicle Accidents"

Swine Flu - C.O.G. - Risk Management AI sustainability extermination CONFIRMED New


Last update: 2 May 2009 at 20:59 (UTC)
Country Cases Deaths
Suspected (probable)[1] Confirmed
Totals 740 4,900+ 17 (101)
Mexico 443[2] 2,500±§[3] 16 (101)[4]
United States 162[5][6] 559 (400)[6] 1[7]
Canada 80[8] 25[9] 0
United Kingdom 15[10] 642[11] 0
Spain 15[12] 103[12] 0
Germany 6[13] 30[13] 0
New Zealand 4[14] 101 (12)[14] 0
Israel 3[15] 1[15] 0
France 2[16] 33 (7)[16] 0
Costa Rica 2[17] 51 (2)[18] 0
South Korea 1[7] 99 (1)[19] 0
Switzerland 1[20] 23[20] 0
Italy 1[21] 20+[22] 0
Hong Kong 1[7] 5[23] 0
Austria 1[10] 2[24] 0
Denmark 1[7] 0 0
Ireland 1[25] 0 0
Netherlands 1[7] 0 0
Other countries 0 286+ (9) 0
§ The Mexican government stopped reporting suspected cases and deaths on April 30, 2009.[3]

This table collects information from media reports regarding swine flu. It is not epidemiological data and so may suffer from one or more measurement biases.

Number of countries with confirmed cases: 17.

Number of countries with confirmed or suspected cases: 41.

Suspected and probable cases have not been confirmed as being due to this strain of influenza by laboratory tests, although some other strains may have been ruled out.

Canada's job losses worst in history
By Editing Staff / TS / NP
Canada's job losses worst in history
The recession hit home last month, as a massive 129,000 workers joined the unemployed, more than half of those in Ontario. The province's unemplyment rate rose to 8%, up from 7.2% in December.

Across the country, it was the worst monthly employment drop in at least three decades, topping figures seen in either of the two previous recessions in the 1980s and 1990s. Almost all the jobs were full-time and were mostly in a battered manufacturing sector that has been most affected by the severe downturn in the United States.

Since October, the country has lost 213,000 jobs, wiping out last year's gains. Economists had been forecasting a much tamer number. "The expectation was for a loss of 40,000... this is three times the expectation," BNN's Michael Kane said Friday morning.

The only industry with notable gains was health care and social assistance, which saw a boost of 31,000 jobs.

Last month, Toronto had an unemployment rate of 7.8% compared to a number in the previous month hovering around 7.3%. Ottawa was Canada's only major city to show improvements with a 10th of a percent down from 4.6%. Windsor, Ontario has gone to over 10%, and that's before the rotating layoffs at GM, Chrysler were announced this morning.

This has been Canada's worst increase in unemployment since Statistics Canada started record-keeping in 1976.

Story originally featured on Canadian Content on Friday February 6, 2009

HR 875 The food police, criminalizing organic farming and the backyard gardener, and violation of the 10th amendment
Posted by LydiaScott on 03/06/09 03:36 AM
Last updated 03/29/09 06:36 AM

[Newer: HR 875 is being steamrolled thru the House and we have to pick up the pace!] [Older: Fed lends Two Trillion with no oversight!]
HR 875

This bill is sitting in committee and I am not sure when it is going to hit the floor. One thing I do know is that very few of the Representatives have read it. As usual they will vote on this based on what someone else is saying. Urge your members to read the legislation and ask for opposition to this devastating legislation. Devastating for everyday folks but great for factory farming ops like Monsanto, ADM, Sodexo and Tyson to name a few.

I have no doubt that this legislation was heavily influenced by lobbyists from huge food producers. This legislation is so broad based that technically someone with a little backyard garden could get fined and have their property siezed. It will affect anyone who produces food even if they do not sell but only consume it. It will literally put all independent farmers and food producers out of business due to the huge amounts of money it will take to conform to factory farming methods. If people choose to farm without industry standards such as chemical pesticides and fertilizers they will be subject to a vareity of harassment from this completely new agency that has never before existed. That's right, a whole new government agency is being created just to police food, for our own protection of course.

DO NOT TAKE MY WORD FOR IT, READ THIS LEGISLATION FOR YOURSELF. The more people who read this legislation the more insight we are going to get and be able to share. Post your observations and insights below. Urge your members to read this legislation and to oppose the passage of this legislation.

Pay special attention to

  • Section 3 which is the definitions portion of the bill-read in it's entirety.
  • section 103, 206 and 207- read in it's entirety.

Red flags I found and I am sure there are more...........

  • Legally binds state agriculture depts to enforcing federal guidelines effectively taking away the states power to do anything other than being food police for the federal dept.
  • Effectively criminalizes organic farming but doesn't actually use the word organic.
  • Affects anyone growing food even if they are not selling it but consuming it.
  • Affects anyone producing meat of any kind including the processing wild game for personal consumption.
  • Legislation is so broad based that every aspect of growing or producing food can be made illegal. There are no specifics which is bizarre considering how long the legislation is.
  • Section 103 is almost entirely about the administrative aspect of the legislation. It will allow the appointing of officials from the factory farming corporations and lobbyists and classify them as experts and allow them to determine and interpret the legislation. Who do you think they are going to side with?
  • Section 206 defines what will be considered a food production facility and what will be enforced up all food production facilities. The wording is so broad based that a backyard gardener could be fined and more.
  • Section 207 requires that the state's agriculture dept act as the food police and enforce the federal requirements. This takes away the states power and is in violation of the 10th amendment.
  • There are many more but by the time I got this far in the legislation I was so alarmed that I wanted to bring someone's attention to it. (to the one person who reads my blog)

Didn't Stalin nationalize farming methods that enabled his administration to gain control over the food supply? Didn't Stalin use the food to control the people?

Last word...... Legislate religion and enforce gag orders on ministers on what can and can't be said in the pulpit, instituting regulations forcing people to rely soley on the government, control the money and the food. What is that called? It is on the tip of my tongue..........

I haven't read any of the Senate's version of the bill as I have been poring thru the House's version. Here is the link and I hope some of you can take a look and post your observations and insights below. One thing I am pretty sure of is that very few if any Senator's have actually read the legislation and when it comes up for a vote they will more than likely take someone else's word on how they should vote. The other thing I am pretty sure about is that the legislation was probably written by lobbyists and industry experts.

S 425

Things you can do

  1. Contact your members at 202-224-3121 and ask them to oppose HR 875 and S 425. While you are at it ask them if they personally have read the legislation and what their position is? If they have not read the legislation ask them to read it and politely let them know that just because other representitives are not reading the legislation and voting on it does not mean they can do the same.
  2. Get in touch with local farmers and food producers by attending a local farmers market and asking them how business is.
  3. Attend a local WAPF meeting, this is a good start to learning about what is going on in farming and local & state initiatives . The website is
  4. Check out the Farmers Legal Defense Fund at
  5. Find out who sits on your states agriculture and farming committee and contact them with your concerns.
  6. Continue to contact your elected officials and let them know your position on legislation and why.
  7. Get active at the local and state levels, this is the quickest way to initiate change.

No comments:

Post a Comment