Gallup Poll: Even the Poor Are Abandoning Obama
In every week of his presidency until now, Barack Obama has enjoyed a majority approval rating in the Gallup Poll from people earning less than $2,000 per month. But that changed in the Gallup survey conducted from Aug. 2-8, when only 49 percent of Americans in that income bracket said they approve of the job Obama is doing.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/71089
Almost as if it was part of some plan...
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread584750/pg6
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=5577.0
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=177543.0
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=152975.0
Biden works directly for Rockefeller and the banking cartel. He is a senior CFR member. He has all the right CFR ties....top zionists, saudi royalty, bilderberg, queen bitches, rothschild, etc. But he answers directly to Rockefeller and the banking cartel.
He is the Gerald Ford in waiting.
A glimpse at how Nixon was set up to take the fall for Watergate
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=278299&mesg_id=278299
Nixon isn't absolved for being a power hungry, ego driven, maniacal bastard. He just didn't have a lot to do with the Watergate break in. In fact the people involved in the break in: Hunt, Liddy, Barker, McCord, a few others) were apparently going out of their way to get caught. Taping a door latch open? Nah. That isn't a professional Black Bag operation.
Here's how you would have done it: The undercover detectives would have been given the night off. Replaced with Hunt or Liddy's own guys. Anyone threatening to blow the cover? Summarily executed and made an example for others.
Plus: In the summer of 1972 There really wasn't any reason for Nixon to bug the Democratic Convention. Tricky Dick mentions his bewilderment here: (listen to the whole discussion between Dean & Nixon) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMe8Ca7c9lQ YouTube - The Nixon Tapes: Watergate, Dean & Liddy
Nixon is right on here wondering (loosely quoted) "Why did they break in to DNC THEN??? Not when I already had the Nov. election in the bag?"
Remember: the Dems had already nominated George McGovern. While a good man it was generally understood that McGovern was unelectable.
So that's when the White House operatives go out on a limb with this freak show break in circus???
I don't think so.
Here's what happened: Dallas 1963 was messy and didn't fool a lot of people. Then in 1972 Nixon was getting troublesome to CIA. He, like Kennedy before him had fired the CIA director and started acting like he was a real president. But killing Nixon would look awful so.
1. Set Nixon up for a fall using some of the same Kennedy assassination Co-conspirators (Hunt, Bush I, the Cuban Barker I'm not sure about the rest).
2. Remove legal protection from Agnew, get him prosecuted for some of his kickbacks as Governor of Maryland. Force his resignation.
3. Install Gerald Ford as V/P. A man friendly to Warren Commission cover-up, Allen Dulles.
4. Nixon falls, Ford takes over, appoints Bush I head of CIA.
Poor Nixon was clueless about this conspiracy. It shows on the tapes! As paranoid as he was he still couldn't visualize that his usefulness to the Bush family was over and they were then intent of promoting Bush I to power. First to cover up remaining CIA/Bush tracks in the JFK assassination Then later either put him in the White House as president or as an effective policy coordinator for a weak minded President like Ronald Reagan.
The game was to allow the bankers more and more control in Washington. And turn the country's foreign policy over to the arms dealers. It worked!
He is the Gerald Ford in waiting.
A glimpse at how Nixon was set up to take the fall for Watergate
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=278299&mesg_id=278299
Nixon isn't absolved for being a power hungry, ego driven, maniacal bastard. He just didn't have a lot to do with the Watergate break in. In fact the people involved in the break in: Hunt, Liddy, Barker, McCord, a few others) were apparently going out of their way to get caught. Taping a door latch open? Nah. That isn't a professional Black Bag operation.
Here's how you would have done it: The undercover detectives would have been given the night off. Replaced with Hunt or Liddy's own guys. Anyone threatening to blow the cover? Summarily executed and made an example for others.
Plus: In the summer of 1972 There really wasn't any reason for Nixon to bug the Democratic Convention. Tricky Dick mentions his bewilderment here: (listen to the whole discussion between Dean & Nixon) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMe8Ca7c9lQ YouTube - The Nixon Tapes: Watergate, Dean & Liddy
Nixon is right on here wondering (loosely quoted) "Why did they break in to DNC THEN??? Not when I already had the Nov. election in the bag?"
Remember: the Dems had already nominated George McGovern. While a good man it was generally understood that McGovern was unelectable.
So that's when the White House operatives go out on a limb with this freak show break in circus???
I don't think so.
Here's what happened: Dallas 1963 was messy and didn't fool a lot of people. Then in 1972 Nixon was getting troublesome to CIA. He, like Kennedy before him had fired the CIA director and started acting like he was a real president. But killing Nixon would look awful so.
1. Set Nixon up for a fall using some of the same Kennedy assassination Co-conspirators (Hunt, Bush I, the Cuban Barker I'm not sure about the rest).
2. Remove legal protection from Agnew, get him prosecuted for some of his kickbacks as Governor of Maryland. Force his resignation.
3. Install Gerald Ford as V/P. A man friendly to Warren Commission cover-up, Allen Dulles.
4. Nixon falls, Ford takes over, appoints Bush I head of CIA.
Poor Nixon was clueless about this conspiracy. It shows on the tapes! As paranoid as he was he still couldn't visualize that his usefulness to the Bush family was over and they were then intent of promoting Bush I to power. First to cover up remaining CIA/Bush tracks in the JFK assassination Then later either put him in the White House as president or as an effective policy coordinator for a weak minded President like Ronald Reagan.
The game was to allow the bankers more and more control in Washington. And turn the country's foreign policy over to the arms dealers. It worked!
4. Nixon falls, Ford takes over, appoints Bush I head of CIA.
... 5. Ford appoints Nelson Rockefeller as V.P.
THE FORTY YEARS WAR - Nixon gave up Vietnam
New Evidence Confirms Pentagon Stole and Leaked Top Secret Documents from Nixon White House
Yeoman Radford stole from Henry Kissinger's briefcase on secret trip to China
Remember, Nixon came to office over the dead body of RFK
We have established that Nixon :
Distrusted and did not confide with the CIA
Distrusted and did not confide with the Joint Chiefs
Distrusted and did not confide with the The State Dept.
Distrusted and did not confide with the Congress
So who did he confide and trust? Kissinger and Rockefeller.... might as a just say Rockefeller and his stooge Kissinger...
Nixon did not know Kissinger well; in fact, he had only met the man once before in his life-at a cocktail party. And Kissinger was on record as standing 180 degrees to the left of Nixon's campaign utterances.
Clearly, Kissinger was put in the Nixon Administration by Rockefeller (who sent his protégé off to Washington with a tidy little gift of $50,000). In his Vice Presidential hearings, Nelson Rockefeller even acknowledged that Kissinger took the job because Rocky asked him to do so
exactly...
related: Obama will create or save 3.5 million jobs in two years- 30 Million Unemployed
... 5. Ford appoints Nelson Rockefeller as V.P.
THE FORTY YEARS WAR - Nixon gave up Vietnam
New Evidence Confirms Pentagon Stole and Leaked Top Secret Documents from Nixon White House
Yeoman Radford stole from Henry Kissinger's briefcase on secret trip to China
Remember, Nixon came to office over the dead body of RFK
We have established that Nixon :
Distrusted and did not confide with the CIA
Distrusted and did not confide with the Joint Chiefs
Distrusted and did not confide with the The State Dept.
Distrusted and did not confide with the Congress
So who did he confide and trust? Kissinger and Rockefeller.... might as a just say Rockefeller and his stooge Kissinger...
Nixon did not know Kissinger well; in fact, he had only met the man once before in his life-at a cocktail party. And Kissinger was on record as standing 180 degrees to the left of Nixon's campaign utterances.
Clearly, Kissinger was put in the Nixon Administration by Rockefeller (who sent his protégé off to Washington with a tidy little gift of $50,000). In his Vice Presidential hearings, Nelson Rockefeller even acknowledged that Kissinger took the job because Rocky asked him to do so
exactly...
related: Obama will create or save 3.5 million jobs in two years- 30 Million Unemployed
BTW - None of the above truths should ever limit proper exposure of the Bilderberg puppet named Barry Soetoro. Quite the contrary, we should always be on the cutting edge of exposing how he has been pushing the Bilderberg agenda from day 1 and now that the Obama Deception is completely exposed...Bilderberg wishes to use him like the horse in Animal Farm.
Barry Soetoro has not only been completely exposed by AJ, WT, AW, others...Top Socialist Journalist in the world outed him on day 1:
John Pilger: The two sides of Barack Obama
EXPOSED: Barack Obama's CIA and Agent Provocateur Connections
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/191292-John-Pilger-s-Speech-The-two-sides-of-Barrack-Obama
John Pilger Youtube Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:19 UTC
The new boss, just like the old boss... Don't expect 'Change' anytime soon. Who is it that Obama serves?
Thought-provoking speech by Australian Journalist and documentary maker John Pilger:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXL998q7skI
EXPOSED: Barack Obama's CIA and Agent Provocateur Connections
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/191292-John-Pilger-s-Speech-The-two-sides-of-Barrack-Obama
John Pilger Youtube Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:19 UTC
The new boss, just like the old boss... Don't expect 'Change' anytime soon. Who is it that Obama serves?
Thought-provoking speech by Australian Journalist and documentary maker John Pilger:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXL998q7skI
Comment: As Pilger relates above, Obama's first employer was Business International Corporation, about which William Blum relates as follows:
In his autobiography, "Dreams From My Fathers", Barack Obama writes of taking a job at some point after graduating from Columbia University in 1983. He describes his employer as "a consulting house to multinational corporations" in New York City, and his functions as a "research assistant" and "financial writer".
The odd part of Obama's story is that he doesn't mention the name of his employer. However, a New York Times story of 2007 identifies the company as Business International Corporation.10 Equally odd is that the Times did not remind its readers that the newspaper itself had disclosed in 1977 that Business International had provided cover for four CIA employees in various countries between 1955 and 1960.
The British journal, Lobster Magazine - which, despite its incongruous name, is a venerable international publication on intelligence matters - has reported that Business International was active in the 1980s promoting the candidacy of Washington-favored candidates in Australia and Fiji. In 1987, the CIA overthrew the Fiji government after but one month in office because of its policy of maintaining the island as a nuclear-free zone, meaning that American nuclear-powered or nuclear-weapons-carrying ships could not make port calls. After the Fiji coup, the candidate supported by Business International, who was much more amenable to Washington's nuclear desires, was reinstated to power - R.S.K. Mara was Prime Minister or President of Fiji from 1970 to 2000, except for the one-month break in 1987.
In his book, not only doesn't Obama mention his employer's name; he fails to say when he worked there, or why he left the job. There may well be no significance to these omissions, but inasmuch as Business International has a long association with the world of intelligence, covert actions, and attempts to penetrate the radical left - including Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) - it's valid to wonder if the inscrutable Mr. Obama is concealing something about his own association with this world.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There is Barky's connection to the Weathermen: Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, agent provocateurs sent in to destroy SDS and the peace movement with their violence, bombs, and robberies--FBI never catches them and finally they turn themselves in only to get off scott-free!
The happy couple today.
The happy couple today.
"The name's Obama -- BARACK Obama."
Joseph Cannon, Cannonfire
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m57169&hd=&size=1&l=e
August 21, 2009
Joseph Cannon, Cannonfire
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m57169&hd=&size=1&l=e
August 21, 2009
Of all the outside-the mainstream notions I've posited on this blog, the one that annoys the most people is my suggestion that the CIA recruited young Barack Obama during his days at Occidental College. I would further suggest that the Agency link runs in the family. I believe that, at an earlier time, the Agency (or some other branch of the intelligence community) may have recruited his mother, Ann Dunham.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
For earlier posts in ths series -- may I call it a series? -- see
here: http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2009/04/obama-passport-scandal-and-murder.html
here: http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2008/10/money.html
here: http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2008/11/spies-lies-barry-and-his-mom.html
and here: http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2009/02/tim-geithners-dad-barack-obamas-mom-and.html
And now we have this intriguing shard of additional data:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
JOHN PILGER:
OBAMA IS A CORPORATE MARKETING CREATION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C62KAmMzu0E
For earlier posts in ths series -- may I call it a series? -- see
here: http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2009/04/obama-passport-scandal-and-murder.html
here: http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2008/10/money.html
here: http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2008/11/spies-lies-barry-and-his-mom.html
and here: http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2009/02/tim-geithners-dad-barack-obamas-mom-and.html
And now we have this intriguing shard of additional data:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
JOHN PILGER:
OBAMA IS A CORPORATE MARKETING CREATION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C62KAmMzu0E
The eye-opener here concerns Obama's first job out of college. He was recruited by Business International Corporation, accused of functioning as a CIA front company. You don't have to take the word of John Pilger, the man in the video. Here's Wikipedia:
The company has been identified as cover organization for the Central Intelligence Agency, e.g. see Lobster Magazine, issue 14 in 1987. According to a lengthy article in the New York Times in 1977, the co-founder of the company told the newspaper that "Eldridge Haynes [the other founder] had provided cover for four CIA employees in various countries between 1955 and 1960".
I see no reason to presume that the CIA/BIC relationship ended in 1960. Lobster is a quirky but reliable publication.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
William Blum, a left-wing CIA expert, made the same catch:
http://killinghope.org/bblum6/aer65.html
William Blum, a left-wing CIA expert, made the same catch:
http://killinghope.org/bblum6/aer65.html
In his autobiography, "Dreams From My Fathers", Barack Obama writes of taking a job at some point after graduating from Columbia University in 1983. He describes his employer as "a consulting house to multinational corporations" in New York City, and his functions as a "research assistant" and "financial writer".
The odd part of Obama's story is that he doesn't mention the name of his employer. However, a New York Times story of 2007 identifies the company as Business International Corporation.
In his book, not only doesn't Obama mention his employer's name; he fails to say when he worked there, or why he left the job.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Obama's bios are as important for what they leave out as for what they reveal. I first became suspicious of his now-infamous trip to Pakistan (which he took in the summer between Occidental and Columbia) because he refused to mention this adventure in his books.
Think of it: We are talking about a man who compiled not one but two autobiographical works before the age of 46. We are talking about an ambitious politician intent on establishing his foreign policy cred. Yet he refused to mention a dangerous trip to Pakistan which he made at a time when travel to that country was discouraged by the State Department. That country was then the focus of the CIA's largest covert operation, the supplying of the Afghan mujahadeen. While there, this callow college kid met with one of the most powerful men in Pakistan -- a meeting arranged by an unnamed personage with the American Embassy. (Spook-watchers know what that means.)
If the trip was a pleasure jaunt, why did Obama keep it a secret? And how did he pay for the journey?
This site encapsulates a series of points which I had earlier made at greater length:
Adding to the mix is the fact that Ann Dunham, Obama's mother, had visited at least 13 countries in her lifetime, and had worked for companies that required travel to Pakistan. Her employers appear to have included the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Ford Foundation, Women's World Bank, and the Asian Development Bank. Note that USAID and the Ford Foundation have (allegedly) been used as covers for CIA agents. . . .
Like mother, like son. Ann worked for at least two organizations notorious for providing CIA cover. Barack went straight from college to an organization known to provide CIA cover. Coincidence?
Let's put it this way: How often do such things happen in your family?
Supposedly, Ann was a leftist. Yet she married Lolo Sotero, a key intermediary between the American oil companies and Indonesian strongman Suharto, installed by the CIA in an extremely bloody coup. (Obama admits the CIA connection in his book.) No genuine lefty would have had anything to do with Suharto or his cronies.
I do not claim to have conclusive evidence. Then again, one must ask: When we try to sort of occurrences in the clandestine world, what constitutes hard evidence? If you are emotionally invested in Obama, then no amount of proof will ever suffice -- except, perhaps, for a signed note by CIA director Panetta, saying "Yes, he worked for us."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Added notes on "The name's Obama -- Barack Obama"
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m57266&hd=&size=1&l=e
by Joseph Cannon, Cannonfire August 23, 2009
Added notes on "The name's Obama -- Barack Obama"
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m57266&hd=&size=1&l=e
by Joseph Cannon, Cannonfire August 23, 2009
A few posts down, I once again discussed my pet theory that young Barack Obama had been recruited by the CIA, a theory which annoys some and intrigues others. (See, for example, the strange blog here.) One piece of evidence favoring this idea concerns Obama's post-college gig at Business International Corporation, a New York firm never named or accurately described in his book, Dreams From My Father. A number of sources have pegged BIC as a company which has provided cover for CIA operatives.
This New York Times story on Obama's New York period offers further insights. The story refers to a blog called Analyze This, maintained by one Dan Armstrong. Unfortunately, that blog has slipped the surly bonds of the internets. When blogs die, the corpse usually lingers online for a good long time -- but Analyze This, alas, has vanished entirely. A pity, that: I've heard that it contained some interesting comments by other BIC alumni.
As does this NPR story.
Armstrong said Obama's book exaggerates just how respectable Business International was, with its description of suits and ties and meetings with German bond traders. There was no dress code, Armstrong said. And there was nothing corporate about it.
"It was a company full of low-paid, hard-working, fun-loving young people," Armstrong said. "It wasn't part of a high-powered consulting or finance world. It was a little sweatshop."
The relevant section of Obama's book, and a counter-piece by Armstrong, can be found here. Obama portrayed the place as as a high-powered consulting house. Armstrong (who worked down the hall) replied:
First, it wasn’t a consulting house; it was a small company that published newsletters on international business. Like most newsletter publishers, it was a bit of a sweatshop. I’m sure we all wished that we were high-priced consultants to multinational corporations. But we also enjoyed coming in at ten, wearing jeans to work, flirting with our co-workers, partying when we stayed late, and bonding over the low salaries and heavy workload.
Barack worked on one of the company’s reference publications. Each month customers got a new set of pages on business conditions in a particular country, punched to fit into a three-ring binder. Barack’s job was to get copy from the country correspondents and edit it so that it fit into a standard outline. There was probably some research involved as well, since correspondents usually don’t send exactly what you ask for, and you can’t always decipher their copy. But essentially the job was copyediting.
I must confess: That does sound like a humdrum gig. Still, I wonder what life was like for the "country correspondents." I can easily see a CIA agent using that job title as cover.
Here's how Armstrong describes Obama's somewhat misleading account of his days at BIC:
All of Barack’s embellishment serves a larger narrative purpose: to retell the story of the Christ’s temptation. The young, idealistic, would-be community organizer gets a nice suit, joins a consulting house, starts hanging out with investment bankers, and barely escapes moving into the big mansion with the white folks. Luckily, an angel calls, awakens his conscience, and helps him choose instead to fight for the people.
Obama left the job without having any other source of income lined up, and his reason for leaving -- guilt over not being true to himself -- strikes me as unconvincing.
If my pet theory has merit, then we may posit that Obama, having done a service for the Agency in Pakistan, was granted a temporary gig at a firm with which the Agency had good relations. In other words, someone was looking out for him.
And just who was the someone? Possibly Zbigniew Brzezinski: Obama was one of only seven students to study sovietology under Brzezinski at Columbia, or so it says here.
The previous post also noted that Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, traveled the world while working for the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Ford Foundation, Women's World Bank, and the Asian Development Bank. USAID is notorious for working with the CIA, as is the Ford Foundation. (For further background, see "The Ford Foundation and the CIA.") But what of the other two groups?
The Asian Development Bank, headquartered in the Philippines, is a financial institution ostensibly devoted to raising Asia's poor out of poverty. A laudable goal. Frankly, though, after reading this Wikipedia entry (which reads like ad copy), I'm still not sure how this organization does what it says it does.
Even the most laudable and respectable organization may still provide cover for CIA-linked individuals, and the Asian Development Bank may have done just that. So, at least, claims the venerable German "spook-watching" publication Geheim!. They published an Agee-like list of CIA personnel serving under various guises throughout the world, a list compiled, it seems, from previous issues of the magazine.
One alleged Agency-linked personage is "Cinnamon N. Dornsife" of the "Asian Development Bank - Manila." Her name is actually N. Cinnamon Dornsife, and she was the "U.S. Ambassdor" to the bank, or so it says here. (I didn't know that countries sent ambassadors to banks. One learns something new every day.) Her resume is here. She was graduated from SAIS, a CIA-linked institution, and then went on to work for six years in Indonesia.
I wonder if she knew Ann?
Women's World Banking provides microcredit financing to woman-owned businesses internationally -- a very commendable goal, to be sure. I've found nothing linking this group to spookery.
So what does it all mean? Perhaps nothing -- after all, many people have worked for BIC, USAID, the Ford Foundation and Asian Development Bank without having any connection to the intelligence community. There's a difference between providing cover for CIA personnel and functioning as a CIA front.
Still, both Barry and his mom have interesting employment histories. Once again, I have to ask: How often does this sort of thing happen in your family?
An added note to the added note: A rather full account of Ann's foreign adventures can be found in a Google machine translation of a piece originally published in an Indonesian blog. The title of the post googles into English as "During the Rose of Heaven All her life Doing Good So Much Amazing That Called Stanley Ann Dunham." I get the impression that the author may have a bias. At any rate, it turns out that her work for the Asian Development bank took her to Pakistan in 1986-87.
Visit page for many many links !
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m57266&hd=&size=1&l=e
John Pilger "The Invisible Government"
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-uq7O1RqQQ
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3WnYrvBO3I
Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtpU2ORFyeo&feature=related
Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqff-glEqkE&feature=related
No comments:
Post a Comment