WakeUp 2010: haarp

Showing posts with label haarp. Show all posts

Thursday, August 19, 2010

US Patent #4,686,605: Atmospheric Alteration Device -- HAARP Array Systems

« on: Today at 04:00:41 AM »

Quote

United States Patent 4,686,605

Eastlund August 11, 1987

Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth's atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere

Abstract

A method and apparatus for altering at least one selected region which normally exists above the earth's surface. The region is excited by electron cyclotron resonance heating to thereby increase its charged particle density. In one embodiment, circularly polarized electromagnetic radiation is transmitted upward in a direction substantially parallel to and along a field line which extends through the region of plasma to be altered. The radiation is transmitted at a frequency which excites electron cyclotron resonance to heat and accelerate the charged particles. This increase in energy can cause ionization of neutral particles which are then absorbed as part of the region thereby increasing the charged particle density of the region.

*****************************************************************************************

Inventors: Eastlund; Bernard J. (Spring, TX)
Assignee: APTI, Inc. (Los Angeles, CA)
Appl. No.: 06/690,333
Filed: January 10, 1985

Current U.S. Class: 361/231 ; 244/158.1; 380/59; 89/1.11

Current International Class: H05H 1/02 (20060101); H05H 1/18 (20060101); F41G 7/20 (20060101); F41G 7/22 (20060101); F41H 13/00 (20060101); H01Q 1/36 (20060101); H05B 006/64 (); H05C 003/00 (); H05H 001/46 ()

Field of Search: 361/230,231 244/158R 376/100 89/1.11 380/59

References Cited [Referenced By]

Other References

Liberty Magazine, (2/35) p. 7 N. Tesla. .
New York Times (9/22/40) Section 2, p. 7 W. L. Laurence. .
New York Times (12/8/15) p. 8 Col. 3..

Primary Examiner: Cangialosi; Salvatore
Attorney, Agent or Firm: MacDonald; Roderick W.
Claims

*****************************************************************************************

I claim:

1. A method for altering at least one region normally existing above the earth's surface with electromagnetic radiation using naturally-occurring and diverging magnetic field lines of the earth [causes heating in the upper atmosphere]comprising transmitting first electromagnetic radiation at a frequency between 20 and 7200 kHz from the earth's surface, said transmitting being conducted essentially at the outset of transmission substantially parallel to and along at least one of said field lines, adjusting the frequency of said first radiation to a value which will excite electron cyclotron resonance at an initial elevation at least 50 km above the earth's surface[excited region can extend from the ground up given enough sources], whereby in the region in which said electron cyclotron resonance takes place heating, further ionization, and movement of both charged and neutral particles is effected, said cyclotron resonance excitation of said region is continued until the electron concentration of said region reaches a value of at least 10.sup.6 per cubic centimeter and has an ion energy of at least 2 ev.

2. The method of claim 1 including the step of providing artificial particles in said at least one region which are excited by said electron cyclotron resonance. [many regions is possible given multiple energy sources]

3. The method of claim 2 wherein said artificial particles are provided by injecting same into said at least one region from an orbiting satellite. [many satellites can be used to create complex systems]

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said threshold excitation of electron cyclotron resonance is about 1 watt per cubic centimeter and is sufficient to cause movement of a plasma region along said diverging magnetic field lines to an altitude higher than the altitude at which said excitation was initiated. [induces energy flow upward]

5. The method of claim 4 wherein said rising plasma region pulls with it a substantial portion of neutral particles of the atmosphere which exist in or near said plasma region. [actual flow of atmosphere upwards occurs.]

6. The method of claim 1 wherein there is provided at least one separate source of second electromagnetic radiation, said second radiation having at least one frequency different from said first radiation[different frequencies stack to create complex resonant signature with widely variable properties], impinging said at least one second radiation on said region while said region is undergoing electron cyclotron resonance excitation caused by said first radiation.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein said second radiation has a frequency which is absorbed by said region.[one frequency allows another to resonate in the region, which allows another, etc]

8. The method of claim 6 wherein said region is plasma in the ionosphere and said second radiation excites plasma waves within said ionosphere. [waves carry energy from area to another]

9. The method of claim 8 wherein said electron concentration reaches a value of at least 10.sup.12 per cubic centimeter. [technical jargon]

10. The method of claim 8 wherein said excitation of electron cyclotron resonance is initially carried out within the ionosphere and is continued for a time sufficient to allow said region to rise above said ionosphere. [rising atmosphere creates a lower pressure area below it]

11. The method of claim 1 wherein said excitation of electron cyclotron resonance is carried out above about 500 kilometers and for a time of from 0.1 to 1200 seconds such that multiple heating of said plasma region is achieved by means of stochastic heating in the magnetosphere. [the momentum from said energy waves causes heating, which causes the rising, which causes the low pressure]

12. The method of claim 1 wherein said first electromagnetic radiation is right hand circularly polarized in the northern hemisphere and left hand circularly polarized in the southern hemisphere. [where the natural magnetic convergences occur at ground level]

13. The method of claim 1 wherein said electromagnetic radiation is generated at the site of a naturally-occurring hydrocarbon fuel source[burned to power generators at ground level], said fuel source being located in at least one of northerly or southerly magnetic latitudes.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein said fuel source is natural gas and electricity for generating said electromagnetic radiation is obtained by burning said natural gas in at least one of magnetohydrodynamic, gas turbine, fuel cell, and EGD electric generators located at the site where said natural gas naturally occurs in the earth.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein said site of natural gas is within the magnetic latitudes that encompass Alaska.[Alaskan HAARP array can allegedly use up to 3 billion watts of power]

*****************************************************************************************

Click HERE for the rest of the Patent.

*****************************************************************************************

My take:

The patent describes a method for stacking waves that excite the magnetosphere, ionosphere, AND atmosphere by causing upward plasma flows resulting in atmospheric uplifting, or low pressure areas.

These low pressure areas are refilled with air from surrounding atmosphere causing wind at the lower levels of the atmosphere.

Atmospheric flow is weather.

This IS weather manipulation technology.

Arrays of generators could be used to create large high pressure areas by flowing air in from all directions to said area.

High pressure areas (denser air) holds exponentially more water per degree celcius (clouds form at a much higher water density in high pressure areas).

Water density at high pressure (temperature) can not get high enough to form clouds, so maximum solar absorption occurs.

The claims of weather weapons being used in Russia are certainly plausible given this quick bit of research into the technology behind HAARP.

I don't know how one would go about detecting and observing all of the frequencies used, and subsequent phenomena that results from each system of frequencies.

You would think that there would be infrared signatures of the rising plasma waves, and patterns of these, forming systems of flow.

I have heard of certain frequencies in the radio range being picked up on shortwave. This only a very small spectrum of the total systems being created by HAARP.

Where is the infrared, where is the visible light emission proof of such manipulation actually occurring?

Given the explanation of the patent, I would say the effects being alleged in Russia would be plausible given many satellite arrays.

But again, where is the proof of these arrays?

Superconductive generators in the frigid vaccum of space could surely create some impressive energy output.

In the words of Mythbusters: PLAUSIBLE!

SIDE NOTE:

In the summer of 1998 (July or August) I was fishing at a high elevation mountain lake and stayed over night.

After dark, from approximately 11pm to 2am there was a spectacular pulsating light pattern covering the entire sky from horizon to horizon to horizon.

It looked like a pulsating electric spiderweb pulsing purples, reds, and greens.

It went on for hours, there was at least 50 other people at the campsites around Bear Lake (Approximately 15km SW of Kelowna, BC) that night.

I would testify on my honor in court to what I saw that night.

Having browsed this patent, I believe this is what I saw that night.

I live too far south in Canada (just north of the US border in Central British Columbia) for Northern Lights to encompass the entire sky from north to south. They only appear in the north, and never the entire sky, and never pulsating spiderweb cellular like patterns.

I searched for it on the Internet when I got home and there was not any news about what we saw.

One thing about the Okanagan Valley: One of the largest ground level magnetic convergences on Earth occurs right here.

Sunday, May 30, 2010

News On HAARP 2010

New(ish) USAF release on HAARP

« on: Today at 04:13:16 PM »

Quote

http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123193118

might give us some clue what to expect - or an insight into what they are "up to" up there:

Military scientists study ionosphere

Posted 3/3/2010 Updated 3/4/2010 Email story Print story

by Bob Freeman
Special to American Forces Press Service

3/3/2010 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- At a facility in a remote part of south-central Alaska, the largest radio transmitter on Earth sends high-frequency signals into the ionosphere to help scientists better understand the influence of charged particles on radio communications and satellite surveillance systems.

Surprisingly, it also is able to create a mini-ionosphere.

"The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, a program known as HAARP, is basically a joint Air Force-Navy program to investigate ionospheric physics and radio science," explained James Battis, HAARP program manager at the Air Force Research Laboratory, during a Feb. 24 interview on Pentagon Web Radio's audio webcast "Armed with Science: Research and Applications for the Modern Military."

Mr. Battis was joined in the interview by Craig Selcher, HAARP program manager at the Naval Research Laboratory, and Todd Pedersen, a senior research physicist at AFRL.

"The ionosphere is a region of the upper atmosphere where there are a significant number of charged particles," Mr. Pedersen said. He explained that energy from the sun, particularly in the ultraviolet wavelengths, strikes atmospheric gas molecules and atoms with enough force to dislodge electrons. This results in a field of negatively charged electrons and positively charged atoms and molecules (ions), maintained in a plasma state, which conducts electrical currents and responds to electric and magnetic fields.

Mr. Battis mentioned that radio waves passing through the ionosphere are affected by the charged particles. "This can affect things like the quality of the signal from a satellite to the ground, or short-wave communications from ground to ground," he said.

He added that the signals from satellite-based surveillance and positioning systems also can be affected by the ionosphere.

"When the signals from GPS come down (from the satellite), their paths are actually deflected by the structure of the ionosphere," he said, "and some GPS errors are due to distortions created by the ionosphere." He explained that while these errors may not be significant to the average user, they can be significant for precise military positioning. "That's one of the reasons (the Defense Department) is interested," he noted.

But the scientists all agreed that communications are the major reason for Defense Department interest.

"These are the transmissions which are used to communicate with aircraft and satellites, so the Air Force is interested largely in effects of the ionosphere on communications," Battis said.

Mr. Selcher agreed. "We have ships all over the globe that we want to be in contact with at all times, so any effect the ionosphere has on communications is something that we want to study," he said.

Mr. Battis noted that the research conducted by HAARP will benefit civilian communication systems as well, including those supporting civil aviation and ground communications.

"Satellite radio and satellite television can also be impacted by naturally occurring ionospheric conditions," Mr. Selcher added. "And trying to understand those is to begin to learn to predict, and maybe to (improve), the problem."

Mr. Battis described much of the previous ionospheric research as passive, with the evaluation of ionospheric effects based on the quality of reception of a normally transmitted radio signal.

"The radio waves we transmit from the array at our facility actively create processes and interactions with the particles in the ionosphere," he said. "Hopefully, we can learn what the responses are and how to use them to improve transmissions through the ionosphere."

"We have radio-wave sensors which send waves up to the ionosphere and listen for a reflection or an echo off something up there," Mr. Pedersen remarked. "And we have passive sensors that will listen to waves produced in the ionosphere, and also optical sensors."

Mr. Pedersen explained that when energy is directed at the ionosphere, some of it eventually comes back in the form of radio waves and some in the form of optical emissions.

"When these electrons get moved around by the electric field, they ultimately run into molecules up there, and when they have enough energy they'll become excited and give off light, just like the inside of a fluorescent light bulb," he said.

Mr. Battis and Mr. Selcher said that the radio waves emitted from the HAARP array create reactions that mimic natural processes in the ionosphere, but they are more controlled and their time and frequency input is measured, allowing the researchers to differentiate them from natural occurrences and better understand the processes at play.

"You can actually repeat the experiment again and again to verify that you're getting the right data and that the data means what you think it means," Mr. Selcher said.

Mr. Battis described the unique nature of the HAARP array, consisting of 180 transmitters distributed over 35 to 40 acres of land, with a frequency range of 2.65 to 10 megahertz.

"We can actually direct the signal within about 15 degrees of the zenith and move the signal in time," he said. "We can paint the sky. Similar facilities are typically restricted to three or four frequencies in that band, whereas we're able to do more continuous frequencies."

"That allows you to really expand the kind of experiments that you can do," Mr. Selcher added. "You can start sweeping the beam around in space, and you can change frequencies to determine if there's a frequency that has a stronger interaction with the ionosphere."

Mr. Pedersen described a surprising advance in the use of HAARP transmitters. He explained that at full power, HAARP is energetic enough that its signals not only light up the gas molecules, they're also able to knock additional electrons off, creating small areas of artificial plasma.

"Sunlight does that, and that's how we get the ionosphere in the first place," Mr. Pedersen said. "The aurora also does it. Electrons come shooting in from the aurora, from far out in space, hit the gas molecules, knock electrons off and create a temporary ionosphere for the duration of time the aurora is there," he explained.

In short, HAARP is able to create a small addition to the ionosphere. "We can add to the ionosphere enough that we can actually start doing experiments in that little spot of plasma that we created from the transmitter," Mr. Pedersen said.

Mr. Pedersen remarked that the next step was to figure out exactly what's happening in this artificial plasma and how to control it.

"This field has been data-starved for many, many years," Mr. Selcher noted, "because there weren't enough facilities that had the kind of power that HAARP has." He explained that theorists proposed many ideas to explain ionospheric interactions, but the data wasn't available to support them. HAARP is changing that.

"It's a nice position to be in as an experimentalist," he said.

(Courtesy of American Forces Press Service)