Crotch Bomber BULL

Chertoff Linked to Body Scanner Manufacturer: http://www.infowars.com/chertoff-linked-to...r-manufacturer/ QUOTE What he has made little mention of is that the Chertoff Group, his security consulting agency, includes a client that manufactures the machines. WELL, WELL OUR OLD DHS HEAD! WHAT A SURPRISE THAT HE WOULD BE INVOLVED IN PROFITING OFF OF THESE SCANNERS! Michael Chertoff Pitchman for Full Body Scanners (Jan 2010) http://strandedpassengers.blogspot.com/201...tchman-for.html Chertoff security firm hires Hayden, three others http://washingtontechnology.com/articles/2...ree-others.aspx http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...p?showtopic=714 http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...?showtopic=1895 More on Airport travesties: http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...topic=6913&st=0 PEOPLE, YOU SHOULD BE OUTRAGED BY THIS! THIS IS NOT ABOUT YOUR SAFETY, IT'S ABOUT CONTROL OVER THE PUBLIC! IF YOU KEEP GIVING IN TO THE TYRANNY, YOU WILL ONLY GET MORE OF THE SAME! SEE A POSTER BELOW OF WHAT THESE BODY SCANNERS CAPTURE! PLEASE PRINT AND PASS OUT TO EDUCATE OTHERS!

jofortruth	Posted: Jan 4 2010, 08:51 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 18,490 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	RapiScan Systems (An OSI Systems Company): http://money.aol.com/article/rapiscan-syst...archsphere_news http://www.osi-systems.com http://www.rapiscansystems.com/ http://www.rapiscansystems.com/peoplescreening.html http://www.rapiscansystems.com/datasheets/...n200_Screen.pdf http://www.rapiscansystems.com/datasheets/...1000_Screen.pdf OSI (OSIS) Stock article I found interesting: (Well, Jim Cramer, their stock will go up now thx to the brief bomber) http://www.thestreet.com/story/10312540/1/...me-unstuck.html http://www.thestreet.com/quote/OSIS.html L-3 Communications http://www.boston.com/business/articles/20.../11/bizscanner/ http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091231-704430.html QUOTE CHICAGO (Dow Jones)--The market for full-body scanners, now being considered for wider use in airport security, includes many more potential end users, according to manufacturer L-3 Communications Holdings Inc. (LLL). In an interview, Tom Ripp, president of Security and Detection Systems at L-3, said 200 of the company's SafeView body scanners have been deployed worldwide. The potential market includes thousands of airport locations as well as courthouses, prisons, border crossings and rail facilities. L-3 and OSI Systems Inc. (OSIS) are the only two companies certified to make full-body scanners for the U.S. government. NOTE: Look how their stock moved after PATSIE BOMBER event on Christmas Day: http://lvlt.client.shareholder.com/stockqu...=10%2F30%2F2004 Attached Image (Click thumbnail to expand)

jofortruth	Posted: Jan 4 2010, 08:59 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 18,490 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	America’s Busiest Airports to Get Body Scanners http://www.infowars.com/americas-busiest-a...-body-scanners/

jofortruth	Posted: Jan 4 2010, 09:01 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 18,490 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	TSA Triples Airport Body Scanners http://www.infowars.com/tsa-triples-airport-body-scanners/ QUOTE John Hughes Bloomberg July 18, 2008 The U.S. Transportation Security Administration will triple the number of devices at airports that can detect bombs under airline passengers’ clothing. The purchase of 80 so-called Passenger Imager machines will bring the total in use next year to 120 at 21 airports, agency spokesman Christopher White said today. The imagers are produced by L-3 Communications Holdings Inc., OSI Systems Inc.’s Rapiscan unit and American Science & Engineering Inc. The TSA hasn’t yet decided which vendors it will use or how much it will spend, White said in an interview. Depending on the model, the devices rely on X-rays to show an outline of travelers’ bodies or electromagnetic waves to create an image that looks like a fuzzy photo negative. They are now used as a substitute for being scanned by TSA screeners with handheld detectors. See the date of this article. They were already putting these bodyscanners in airports. Now that the BRIEF BOMBER comes along they are using it to justify all the scanners they already have in place (testing btw) and to install more and make them mandatory! What's more interesting is that this is part of a UN plan and happening all over the world!

jofortruth	Posted: Jan 5 2010, 12:44 AM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 18,490 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	American Science and Engineering, Inc. http://www.boston.com/business/articles/20.../11/bizscanner/

jofortruth	Posted: Jan 5 2010, 08:11 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 18,490 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Why would anyone submit to these body scans when traveling or going anywhere? Do you like becoming a slave? With every inch you give the NWO, they will take a mile? When are you going to say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH??????? When will you tell the NWO Elite, who are behind all of this tyranny, "I will not comply, PERIOD!" Alex Jones Calls For Mass Resistance To Implementation Of Body Scanners http://www.prisonplanet.com/alex-jones-cal...y-scanners.html There comes a time when a man must stand up, and that time is now! This is over the top! If you care about your family, you will stand up to this, and say "NO" "HELL NO"! Take a look at this! Attached Image (Click thumbnail to expand)

jofortruth	Posted: Jan 6 2010, 01:03 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 18,490 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Security industry booms amid scanner rush http://www.prisonplanet.com/security-indus...anner-rush.html

jofortruth

Posted: Jan 6 2010, 02:07 PM

Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 18,490 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07

Dutch to Use Body Scanners - New Technology Will Screen U.S.-Bound Passengers Amid Privacy Concerns http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126217311115510051.html QUOTE In early 2009, the TSA began testing the machines as a primary screening method, replacing walk-through metal detectors. The move helped prompt more than 30 U.S. organizations, grouped as The Privacy Coalition, to write to Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano voicing objections. In June, the House of Representatives passed a motion sponsored by Rep. Jason Chaffetz of Utah blocking the TSA from compelling passengers to undergo body scans until privacy issues were resolved. In recent days, other members of Congress have rejected such calls. INTERESTING HOW THE UNDERWEAR BOMBER CAME ON THE SCENE AT AN OPPORTUNE TIME FOR THE BODY SCANNER MANUFACTURERS. They had been testing the scanners in a few airports in the USA since early 2009 (see above), now all they needed was some threat that would fearmonger the people into accepting them. BINGO the idiot appears - BRIEF BOY! Then they start announcing they're going to put them in all major airports, and the manufacturers stocks rise right after the event! HUM! http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Deception/index.php?showtopic=7836&st=0

Burj Dubai Complete!

Flight 253 Passengers Tell Their Story!

Friday, January 01, 2010

Latest Story--By Kurt Haskell

-The Man In Orange and the Merry Go Round of Ron Smith/U.S. Customs-

As many of you know, my wife Lori and I were passengers and innocent victims of Northwest Flight 253 (Flight 253). We have repeated our story many times to various reporters, television and radio stations ,both across the country and abroad. Our story has never changed. What I would like to emphasize in this article is that not only did we almost lose our lives in the air, but we also almost lost our lives after our plane landed. Let me explain.

When Flight 253 landed, the passengers were forced to stay on the plane on the runway for 20 minutes. We were forced to do this despite not knowing whether there was a further bomb on our plane held by another passenger, in a carry on bag, or in the cargo hold. This action taken by law enforcement further endangered the lives of every passenger on flight 253.

After we were removed from the plane all of the passengers of flight 253 were taken to an empty baggage claim area of an airport terminal. We all had our carry on bags with us and we stood together for nearly one hour until bomb sniffing dogs arrived. Three dogs arrived, one lab, and two German shepherds. The dogs were split up and one German shepherd sat next to a bag of “the man in orange” who stood 20 feet from me the entire time until he was detained (see my post yesterday for more detail). This man in orange was immediately taken into a room for questioning. He was not handcuffed at this time. After approximately one hour, the man in orange was taken out of that room, handcuffed, and led away. At this exact time, a law enforcement person came up to the group of flight 253 passengers and said the following (approximate quote) “You are all being moved to another area because this are is not safe. You all just saw what happened and I’m sure you are smart enough to read between the lines and figure out what is going on.” We were then escorted out of this baggage claim room and taken to a long narrow hallway. While we were being held in this area, an FBI agent announced the following to us 253 passengers “We have those (Plural) we believe are responsible for this in custody we will now be doing interviews with each of you and then you are free to go.” He went on to state two further references to more than one person, which I cannot specifically quote. I have repeated this exact story hundreds of times since flight 253.

The “official” story regarding the man in orange has now changed numerous times.

Version 1: This was the official story from 12-25-09 to 12-30-09. This version was that only Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was involved or detained.

Version 2: After some of my fellow passengers supported my claim in media accounts, this version 2 was released and became the official story on December 30, 2009.. This version was that, yes, another man was taken into custody, but he was being held indefinitely on “immigration charges”.

Version 3: This version came out late in the day on December 30, 2009. This version provided that yes another man was taken into custody, but he was from another flight. This story was the most ridiculous version to date and made myself write the current article on Mlive.com.

http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2009/12/flight_253_passenger_kurt_hask.html

Let me explain.

Ever since the passengers of flight 253 got off of the plane, we were “quarantined”. By this I mean that nobody was allowed on our floor of the terminal or anywhere near any of us passengers. As a matter of fact, we never saw anyone except law enforcement personnel the entire time we were held by customs (6 hours). To say that the man that was being held was from another flight, and is the same one I saw 20 feet away from me the entire time, defies logic. We were in such tight security that we were not able to drink, eat, use our phones, or go to the bathroom by ourselves (without a law enforcement officer). However, this version tries to make the American public believe that passengers from other flights were by us commingling the entire time. This did not happen. To think that law enforcement would let anyone else near the passengers and crime scene of the biggest terrorist attack in 8 years is simply beyond comprehension. Further, every plane that landed for quite some time after we did, held its passengers on board for a long time. The man in orange was taken away one hour into our detention period (during which, I do not believe any other flights allowed their passengers to get off of). Most certainly however, no other passengers were on the baggage claim floor that we were. When I wrote the above Mlive article I predicted that I would soon see version 4 of the “official story”. I was overwhelmed to find not only a fourth version, but a fifth version.

Version 4: Shortly after 6PM eastern time on December 31, 2009, Ron Smith of U.S. Customs sent an email to various reporters across the country. I received my copy from a reporter that I have been corresponding with. Here is a copy of the email:

All,



Good Evening,



Thank you for your patience and accuracy in reporting the events of December 25 at Detroit Metropolitan Airport. Everything we have talked about has been accurate concerning these events



That being said I have just received a piece of information that I did not previously have and hope it will clear up this matter.



As I have explained, there were no other passengers from flight 253 arrested or detained. The eyewitness accounts coincided with a separate issue concerning a passenger from a separate flight arriving at the airport. That passenger was escorted from the arriving plane to the CBP area. He was handcuffed at that time and could have been observed by the passengers from flight 253.



This still remains true; however, I now know that a passenger from flight 253 did have a canine alert to his carry on baggage in the baggage area of the CBP facility. He was placed in handcuffs and escorted to an interview room where he was interviewed and searched. There was nothing found during that search. Following the negative search results he received an explanation of why he was searched. He thanked the officers for doing their job and departed the facility along with the other passengers from flight 253.



I can not provide any other information about the individual because again, he was not arrested or detained and we have to protect his privacy.



This information is consistent with the eyewitness accounts.



I accept full responsibility for this information not being made available to you. I did not access the correct report that contained this information. I take pride in providing my media contacts complete, accurate information and I did not accomplish that this time. Please accept my apologies for any difficulties this may create.



I am sending this as an email because I will be traveling this evening and will not be available by phone until first thing in the morning.



Respectfully,



Ronald G Smith

Chief CBP Officer

Public Affairs Liaison

US Customs and Border Protection

Office of Field Operations

Mr. Ron Smith now claims the following:

1. “He just received some information he didn’t previously have”. Seriously.
2. “The eyewitness accounts coincided with a separate issue concerning a passenger from a separate flight arriving at the airport”. Please see above where I explain that we were “quarantined” which makes this statement impossible.
3. “He now knows (as if he didn’t before), that a passenger from flight 253 did have a canine alert to his carry on baggage in the baggage area of the CBP facility. . . There was nothing found during the search”.
First of all, does it seem plausible that Mr. Ron Smith didn’t have and know all of this information before? Also, please see my account of events above, where I explain that the man in orange was taken away not in handcuffs, but was HANDCUFFED AFTER HE WAS QUESTIONED/SEARCHED FOR AN HOUR! Remember, we were then moved to a new “safe” area at this time and damning comments were made by a law enforcement officer(see above).
4. “This information is consistent with eyewitness accounts”. Not mine Mr. Smith.
5. “He accepts full responsibility because he did not access the correct report that contained this information.” Mr. Smith, are you sloppy and incompetent or something else? This is the most important story in 8 years and a spokesperson for U.S. Customs just cannot come out in public and make an incorrect statement of this magnitude.
6. “Please accept my apologies . . . “ Where is my apology Mr. Smith? Oh wait, I don’t get one because the purpose of this bogus story was to discredit me…………….

Version 5: I was pretty shocked to see version 5 come out this morning in The Detroit News. It seems that Mr. Smith works really hard at this. Of course it would be much easier to just put out one correct story.

http://www.detnews.com/article/20100101/NATION/1010354/1020/rss09

This is my second favorite version besides version 3. Now Mr. Smith claims the following:

1. “My account is a composite of two events at the airport around the time passengers got off flight 253. Both events were unrelated to the suspected terrorist incident.” One of these events involved a passenger from flight 249. Come on Mr. Smith, we both know that our flight was completely “quarantined”. Please see above for a further explanation.

2. “A sniffer dog reacted to agriculture or food products inside the bag of a third man who was off yet another flight”. OK, passengers from other flights DID NOT COMINGLE WITH OUR FLIGHT!

Funnier yet, Mr. Smith is proposing that a dog sniffing for food from another flight was the same as the dog sniffing for a bomb in the carry on bag carried by the orange dressed man on flight 253, who stood 20 feet away from me the entire time until he was taken away. Oh boy is that ever a stretch.

3. “Officials did attempt to segregate flight 253 passengers but the entire baggage area was not cleared”.

Think about this one for a minute. You have the biggest crime scene in 8 years. You don’t know if there are further bombs. Federal law enforcement is involved. You don’t know if there are accomplices. You need to find evidence Yet Mr. Smith proposes that law enforcement was unable to segregate the passengers of Flight 253 and let others trample through our “quarantine area”. Mr. Smith you should become a comedian.


Please answer a few questions for me Mr. Smith before I accept the apology you have yet to give to the passengers of flight 253:

1. Why were the passengers of flight 253 detained on a plane for 20 minutes not knowing if there was another bomb on the plane, in the cargo hold, or on another passenger after the “terrorist” had admitted that he had an explosive device in his pocket to a flight attendant, tried to detonate it, and set our plane on fire? Was it gross incompetence or something else?

2. Why were the passengers of flight 253 taken WITH their carry on bags and held with them for one hour before bomb sniffing dogs arrived in the baggage claim area of the terminal, all the while not knowing if any of the bags contained a bomb? Was it gross incompetence or something else? Did law enforcement intentionally risk the ENITRE AIRPORT TERMINAL TO AN EXPLOSIVE DEVICE or was it something else?

3. Why did you indicate to a well respected reporter that our carry on bags were searched ON THE PLANE, when in fact they were never searched (except for sniffer dogs), until she told you that my wife and I adamantly disputed your claim? Then you suddenly changed the official position to, yes, the carry on bags were not searched? (This was relayed to me in confidence)

Mr. Smith, I think if you honestly answer the few questions above, we will have our answer as to why the “official” position regarding the man in orange has changed 5 times. I suspect that all of the above is tied in together. Draw your own conclusion.

By the way, I look forward to version six of the official story.

I am not going away.

---A concerned American and a victim on multiple fronts, Kurt Haskell

Composed By: Lori H at Friday, January 01, 2010

The Pineal Gland Is A Stargate!

This is a playlist

Iceland stands up for its people

Iceland has message for the Dutch / British NWO Bankers

Iceland blocks repayment of £2.3bn to Britain

Iceland Prime Minister has not signed up to repay so called 'loans', but handed the decision to the people in a referendum.

The British Government's already stretched finances came under further pressure today when Iceland's President vetoed the repayment of a £2.3 billion loan from the British taxpayer.

Considering Gordon Brown used Anti-Terrorism legislation to steal Icelands money, and that a large chunk of Iceland is now fully awake to the Money As Debt banking fraud... It don't look good for the Banks.

Shooting Handcuffed Children

by David Swanson

The occupied government of Afghanistan and the United Nations have both concluded that U.S.-led troops recently dragged eight sleeping children out of their beds, handcuffed some of them, and shot them all dead. While this apparently constitutes an everyday act of kindness, far less intriguing than the vicious singeing of his pubic hairs by Captain Underpants, it is at least a variation on the ordinary American technique of murdering men, women, and children by the dozens with unmanned drones.

Also this week in Afghanistan, eight CIA assassins (see if you can find a more appropriate name for them) were murdered by a suicide bombing that one of them apparently executed against the other seven. The Taliban in Pakistan claims credit and describes the mass-murder as revenge for the CIA's drone killings. And we thought unmanned drones were War Perfected because none of the right people would have to risk their lives. Oops. Perhaps Detroit-bound passengers risked theirs unwittingly.

The CIA has declared its intention to seek revenge for the suicide strike. Who knows what the assassination of sleeping students was revenge for. Perhaps the next lunatic to try blowing up something in the United States will be seeking revenge for whatever Obama does to avenge the victims (television viewers?) of the Crotch Crusader. Certainly there will be numerous more acts of violence driven by longings for revenge against the drone pilots and the shooters of students.

In a civilized world, the alternative to vengeance is justice. Often we can even set aside feelings of revenge as long as we are able to act so as to deter more crime. But at the same time that the puppet president of Afghanistan is demanding the arrest of the troops who shot the handcuffed children, the puppet government of Iraq is facing up to the refusal of the United States to seriously prosecute the Blackwater assassins of innocent Iraqis. Justice will not be permitted as an alternative to vengeance -- the mere idea is anti-American.

No one so much as blinks at the CIA's avowal of vengeance for the recent suicide attack, never mind the illegality, because the entire illegal war on Afghanistan/Pakistan was launched and is still maintained as a pretended act of revenge for the crimes of 9-11. Of course, we're not bombing the flight schools or the German and Spanish hotels. Of course , we admit that there are fewer than 100 members of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. Of course we openly seek massive permanent bases and an oil pipeline. Of course, Obama's decisions are all electoral calculations computed by the calculus of cowardice. Of course, we're prosecuting the Butt Bomber as a criminal, just as we always used to prosecute criminals as criminals. Of course, revenge would not be a legal justification for war even if we could persuade ourselves it was a sane one. But the war is publicly understood as revenge, the resistance by its victims is understood as revenge, the escalation is understood as revenge for the resistance, and an eye for an eye slowly makes the whole world blind.

But here's what we've forgotten: nothing is ever remotely as horrible as war. So, nothing can ever constitute a justification for launching or escalating or continuing a war. Dragging children out of bed and killing them is not a freak blip in the course of a war. It is war reduced to a comprehensible scale. It's less war, not worse war. Everything we are spending our grandchildren's unearned pay on, borrowed from China at great expense, all of it is for the murdering of human beings. And it will remain so for eternity, no matter how many times you chant "Support Duh Troops."

I know many soldiers and mercenaries had few other options, given our failure to invest in any other industries. I know they've been lied to. I know they're scared and tired. But they wouldn't be there if we brought them home. And I support a full investment in their physical and mental and economic recovery. What I don't support is anyone participating in these wars, and that includes every single American who is not putting every spare moment into demanding that Congress stop forking over the money.

It's blood money. It's payment for murder. It cannot be defended. It cannot be permitted. We must stop it now. We must shut down the place it comes from.

Not another dime. Not another dollar. Not another death. Not another thought of revenge.

Resist The Airport Scanners!

Alex Jones Calls For Mass Resistance To Implementation Of Body Scanners

Petitions, boycotts and lawsuits needed to halt latest manifestation of prison planet being constructed around humanity

Paul Joseph Watson
http://www.prisonplanet.com/
Tuesday, January 5, 2010

Radio talk show host Alex Jones is calling for petitions, boycotts and lawsuits en mass in an effort to block the nationwide implementation of full body scanners that represent a total violation of privacy, a health risk, and the next wave of tyranny being metered out against the American people and the people of the world under the phony pretext of fighting terrorism.

Our long journey into domestication and dependency on the scientific dictatorship is accelerating, our entire society is being turned into a massive surveillance grid, it has been designed to persecute the people, Jones warned on his show yesterday, adding that the scanners were the latest manifestation of the prison planet being constructed around humanity.

Allied with the contrived global warming movement, terrorism is the other prong of the pincer being used to crush freedom and advance totalitarianism in the developed world as Homeland Security follows the plan it was created to carry out the gradual implementation of martial law in America characterized by the kind of stifling security we now see in airports being introduced into our daily lives in shopping malls, public schools, and many other buildings.

Jones warned that those who refuse the body scan and opt for a pat down will be subject to a strip search and treated like terrorists.

Were being trained like dogs.youre the people they want to train to accept this, youre the milk cows, youre the cattle, youre the once proud free people being trained to accept this, said Jones, adding that the funding was already in place for body scanners at all U.S. airports in early 2009 before the Christmas Day incident magically arrived to provide the perfect pretext to push ahead with pull implementation.

Magically that happens and they begin beating the drum within hours of it, see we must have the body scanners, it was all set, it was all rigged, every TV network, every station had their talking points, said Jones, adding that body scanners were instantly promoted as the solution, allied with calls to renew the rapidly expiring Patriot Act.